Every engagement is scoped to your environment and the framework requirements that matter to your organization or customers.
A gap assessment against applicable NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5 controls, scoped to the control families relevant to your environment. Findings are organized by risk level with a clear remediation roadmap for each item.
Available in two scopes:
Focused review of the highest-impact control families. Ideal for organizations seeking an initial compliance picture or validating a specific control domain.
Broader review scoped to the applicable NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 control families for your environment, with full executive reporting and prioritized findings.
State agencies, healthcare organizations, federal contractors, and organizations whose customers or regulators require alignment with NIST SP 800-53.
A readiness assessment aligned with CMMC Level 2 and the 110 NIST SP 800-171 requirements, designed to help contractors identify gaps and understand their current posture.
Covers all 14 domains and 110 security requirements in NIST SP 800-171, organized by practice family with readiness status and gap analysis for each requirement.
KGA Partners provides CMMC readiness and advisory services and does not perform CMMC certification assessments. Formal CMMC Level 2 certification requires assessment by an authorized C3PAO.
Defense contractors and subcontractors handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) who need to understand their current posture and address NIST SP 800-171 requirements.
A compliance review aligned with the Texas DIR Security Control Standards to identify control gaps relevant to state and public-sector requirements.
The Texas DIR Security Control Standards Catalog is based on NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 and establishes minimum information security requirements for Texas state agencies and institutions of higher education under TAC §202.
Texas state agencies and institutions of higher education, along with other public-sector organizations seeking alignment with Texas DIR security practices.
A core part of our assessment methodology, reviewing and evaluating the IT general controls that support effective governance, security, and compliance.
ITGC review is integrated into most framework engagements and can also be delivered as a standalone control review when an organization needs to understand the strength of its foundational IT controls independently of a specific framework.
Every full assessment concludes with clear reporting for leadership and a prioritized roadmap for remediation.
Written for leadership to read quickly. No technical jargon, clear risk language.
High-risk, moderate-risk, and low-risk findings organized for clear prioritization.
Actionable next steps for each finding, providing your IT team or provider with clear direction for remediation.
Findings documented in a format suitable to share with auditors, customers, or board-level stakeholders.
A targeted review scoped to a specific control domain, framework section, or compliance question. Applicable across NIST, CMMC, Texas DIR, and ITGC. Ideal for organizations that need a fast picture of a defined area before committing to a broader engagement.
A broader assessment scoped to applicable NIST SP 800-53, CMMC Level 2 readiness, or Texas DIR requirements, with executive-level reporting and prioritized findings. Timeline is confirmed after scope and evidence requirements are established.
Coordinated assessment support across more than one framework, scoped for organizations managing multiple compliance requirements. For example, a Texas organization that must align with Texas DIR and NIST SP 800-53 simultaneously.
30-minute call to understand your environment, drivers, and framework requirements.
Confirm the applicable framework, control areas, and engagement boundaries.
We identify the applicable framework and requirements, whether NIST SP 800-53, CMMC Level 2 readiness, Texas DIR, or ITGC.
Evidence request list provided to your team based on the agreed scope.
Documentation, policies, configurations, and records reviewed against the agreed requirements.
Questions and clarifications addressed with your team to ensure accurate findings.
Controls evaluated against the agreed scope and applicable framework requirements.
Gaps identified, documented, and risk-scored relative to the framework and your environment.
Findings report with risk ratings and remediation roadmap drafted and reviewed.
Report delivered and walked through with your leadership and technical team. You own the documentation.